Mandatory Fairness

“It is logically impossible to have a game in which both the actions of the players and the final score can be subject to rules of fairness.”

From Benn Steil’s and Manuel Hinds’s Money, Markets & Sovereignty

via  Cafe Hayek

Big Babe Tennis

The Gorillo strikes again.

more about “Big Babe Tennis“, posted with vodpod

Changing the Weather

We think back to people dancing around a fire doing a “rain dance” in hopes that it will bring rain. Somehow, it is easy for everyone today to see the stupidity in that, but most see nothing wrong with tossing away billions an billions of dollars in present times to basically “change the weather.” Increased stupidity, such as this, does not help the argument for human evolution.

We might as well throw all that money in the fire and start doing the dance, as the effects will be the same and at least we could roast marshmallows.

Embracing Ignorance

A timeless quote from Murray Rothbard,

“It is no crime to be ignorant of economics, which is, after all, a specialized discipline and one that most people consider to be a ‘dismal science.’ But it is totally irresponsible to have a loud and vociferous opinion on economic subjects while remaining in this state of ignorance.”

This reminds me of the present day thinker phd who wisely said

“It’s difficult to have a battle of wits when your opponent refuses to arm himself.

Well said, Skip. Well said.

Public Servants??

Sleazy politicians (generalizing, and redundant) love to think of themselves as public servants. Are they serving the public by threatening to recoup earned income from individuals, or by scaring a constituent who may have the audacity to have a differing opinion on government bailouts?

I read this letter at the Cafe which was sent from humble servants to one of their lords.

Keynesian Ignorance

As a believer in free-market economics, I am often amazed that one of John Maynard Keynes most enduring lines is “in the long run, we’re all dead,” referencing the need for government interaction even though in the long run it may be destructive.

This logic applied to almost any day-to-day decision would be ridiculed and seem to come from an elementary student (literally, an elementary student – grades kindergarten through fifth).

- Why should a child brush his teeth?? Think of all that time he/she could spend watching cartoons which would produce much more utility.

- Why should a high school student finish high-school?? If he dropped out, lived at home, and saved his paychecks like crazy, he could accumulate perhaps $50,000 in savings during that time. Surely, it would take over a decade to even break even and who knows if he will live to thirty.

Maybe the best question would be why on earth would anyone pre-plan for one’s own death buy sorting out funeral arrangements, having life insurance, or even making a will.? After all, even in the case that one needs those things, one is already dead so who cares, right?

I read an article today from Veronique de Rugy at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University which deals with future effects from budget deficits. Her last sentence, in my opinion,  flattens Keynes with some simple logic about that ole’ long run.

John Maynard Keynes, the 20th century’s preeminent defender of deficit spending, famously quipped, “In the long run, we are all dead.” Keynes did not give much guidance, though, on how we would pay for the funeral.

Ya’ know, deficits, like all things, do have long-ranging consequences – yes , John, even after we’re dead.

Raise a glass to JMK, a great thinker, an Englishman, but unfortunately for him, also shown to be dead wrong.

So Long, Mini-Van

With over 10 hours of driving between two of us (guess), the trip home is nearly complete and the show is now ending. A special thanks to all who made this historic 4 day event possible, with the specific mention to the man of the trip himself, hp. See you on the next go-round.

Aloha

Stay Classy, Cherry Hill…

Hp and I took the gas in our first round of action on Friday evening. Neither one of us played particularly well and we lost a very winnable match, but that is tennis. Saturday saw both teams in the feed-in consolations where the outcome was no better. Mjp and hp lost to a pretty good team (not as good as the first day) and then hp and I followed suit that afternoon, though we did play much better. 5 more years and we get the super-seniors.

Score Final

6-2,6-1. I thought mjp was going to hit hp at one point, probably a good thing the match has ended

Score Update

At 6-2, 3-0 down, my prediction has been shown to unfortunately be correct. The boys are still fighting hard, even switching sides for return of serve in the second set. This one is just a case of going up against a better younger team.